This is a Xbox 360 fan only forum. If you're not here to root for the home team please find another forum that better suits your taste.

Thank you for your interest,

Xbox Republic Admins

NOTE: If you can't register it may be due to a temporary lockdown. Wait a day or two and we will probably have reopened for new registrations.



 
HomeHome  PortalPortal  RegisterRegister  Log in  

Share | 
 

 Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
BlackStigma
Four Star General (Moderator)
Four Star General (Moderator)


Posts: 2308
Join date: 2009-12-01
Location: US

PostSubject: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.   Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:49 pm

Here is the price of them.

Kinect - $150 (Kinect and Kinect Adventures)

Move - $100 starter bundle (PSwand, PSeye, and Sports Champion)
However you also need a Navigation Controller so $130. Kinect can scan 6 people and support 2 active players, so for multiplayer you need another $80 with Move.

So Move - $210

Remember 2 years ago with the 360 and PS3?
360 Pro - $300 with 60GB
PS3 - $400 with 80GB
However the PS3 had a wi-fi adapter and the controller charged with USB. It lacked a mic however. But it also had a blueray drive and free online gaming. Basically the 360 had accessories that weren't absolutely necessary but the PS3 came standard with them. It's like Kinect and Move, although Move appears to be cheaper at first it actually has some hidden cost that the 360 had. (that aren't completely necessary)

So Move may be cheaper or more expensive under certain conditions (such as only 1 player), Kinect has everything you need and you don't need extra stuff so it has a better value like the PS3 did back then.

It's just like the 360 vs. PS3 price argument but switched around. It's very ironic, has anybody else noticed it?


Last edited by BlackStigma on Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
lightlamp
Master Chief Petty Officer
Master Chief Petty Officer


Posts: 948
Join date: 2009-09-11

PostSubject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.   Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:54 pm

Never thought about that heh good for pointing that out
Back to top Go down
Inuboy1000
Fleet Master Chief Petty Officer
Fleet Master Chief Petty Officer


Posts: 681
Join date: 2010-07-15
Age: 18
Location: None of Your Business!

PostSubject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.   Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:26 pm

So basically the PS3 fanboys are hypocrites now.
Back to top Go down
http://www.facebook.com/Inuboy1000z
ghost23
Four Star General (Moderator)
Four Star General (Moderator)


Posts: 3426
Join date: 2009-12-16
Location: Australia

PostSubject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.   Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:54 pm

This thread has already been made multiple times.

Move does indeed have the worst pricing structure I have ever seen for anything.

_________________
Live by the Creed

Back to top Go down
Teckno
Command Master Chief Petty Officer
Command Master Chief Petty Officer


Posts: 596
Join date: 2010-07-27

PostSubject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.   Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:23 pm

Actually, Kinect games are more expensive. I think 10$ more.
Back to top Go down
Invincible
Fleet Master Chief Petty Officer
Fleet Master Chief Petty Officer


Posts: 672
Join date: 2010-03-18

PostSubject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.   Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:32 pm

Last year I was super hyped for Natal/Kinect. It was one of the reasons I got a new 360 elite. Because I wanted to be ready when it came out. But after watching the E3 conference I've pretty much lost interest. I don't think the tech will work like it's supposed to and the launch games are only for the most casual of gamers.


Back to top Go down
Master_Chief
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Posts: 3050
Join date: 2009-09-30
Location: Area 51

PostSubject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.   Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:51 pm

FullMetalKendo wrote:
So basically the PS3 fanboys are hypocrites now.
The PS3 fanboys have always been hypocrites.
Back to top Go down
Stoney
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Posts: 2810
Join date: 2009-11-03
Age: 23
Location: In the gutter

PostSubject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.   Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:12 am

BlackStigma wrote:
Here is the price of them.

Kinect - $150 (Kinect and Kinect Adventures)

Move - $100 starter bundle (PSwand, PSeye, and Sports Champion)
However you also need a Navigation Controller so $130. Kinect can scan 6 people and support 2 active players, so for multiplayer you need another $80 with Move.

So Move - $210

Remember 2 years ago with the 360 and PS3?
360 Pro - $300 with 60GB
PS3 - $400 with 80GB
However the PS3 had a wife adapter and the controller charged with USB. It lacked a mic however. But it also had a blueray drive and free online gaming. Basically the 360 had accessories that weren't absolutely necessary but the PS3 came standard with them. It's like Kinect and Move, although Move appears to be cheaper at first it actually has some hidden cost that the 360 had. (that aren't completely necessary)

So Move may be cheaper or more expensive under certain conditions (such as only 1 player), Kinect has everything you need and you don't need extra stuff so it has a better value like the PS3 did back then.

It's just like the 360 vs. PS3 price argument but switched around. It's very ironic, has anybody else noticed it?


I know its a typo, but its a funny one at that. "However the PS3 had a wife adapter" Laughing

Back to top Go down
Arbiteris
Four Star General (Moderator)
Four Star General (Moderator)


Posts: 5064
Join date: 2009-09-15
Location: Sanghelios

PostSubject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.   Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:18 am

xSTONEYx187x wrote:
BlackStigma wrote:
Here is the price of them.

Kinect - $150 (Kinect and Kinect Adventures)

Move - $100 starter bundle (PSwand, PSeye, and Sports Champion)
However you also need a Navigation Controller so $130. Kinect can scan 6 people and support 2 active players, so for multiplayer you need another $80 with Move.

So Move - $210

Remember 2 years ago with the 360 and PS3?
360 Pro - $300 with 60GB
PS3 - $400 with 80GB
However the PS3 had a wife adapter and the controller charged with USB. It lacked a mic however. But it also had a blueray drive and free online gaming. Basically the 360 had accessories that weren't absolutely necessary but the PS3 came standard with them. It's like Kinect and Move, although Move appears to be cheaper at first it actually has some hidden cost that the 360 had. (that aren't completely necessary)

So Move may be cheaper or more expensive under certain conditions (such as only 1 player), Kinect has everything you need and you don't need extra stuff so it has a better value like the PS3 did back then.

It's just like the 360 vs. PS3 price argument but switched around. It's very ironic, has anybody else noticed it?


I know its a typo, but its a funny one at that. "However the PS3 had a wife adapter" Laughing



Lmao
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.   Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:09 am

xSTONEYx187x wrote:
BlackStigma wrote:
Here is the price of them.

Kinect - $150 (Kinect and Kinect Adventures)

Move - $100 starter bundle (PSwand, PSeye, and Sports Champion)
However you also need a Navigation Controller so $130. Kinect can scan 6 people and support 2 active players, so for multiplayer you need another $80 with Move.

So Move - $210

Remember 2 years ago with the 360 and PS3?
360 Pro - $300 with 60GB
PS3 - $400 with 80GB
However the PS3 had a wife adapter and the controller charged with USB. It lacked a mic however. But it also had a blueray drive and free online gaming. Basically the 360 had accessories that weren't absolutely necessary but the PS3 came standard with them. It's like Kinect and Move, although Move appears to be cheaper at first it actually has some hidden cost that the 360 had. (that aren't completely necessary)

So Move may be cheaper or more expensive under certain conditions (such as only 1 player), Kinect has everything you need and you don't need extra stuff so it has a better value like the PS3 did back then.

It's just like the 360 vs. PS3 price argument but switched around. It's very ironic, has anybody else noticed it?


I know its a typo, but its a funny one at that. "However the PS3 had a wife adapter" Laughing



lol! lol!
Back to top Go down
 

Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

 Similar topics

-
» alisa bosconovitch move list
» Jeremy Rifkin on where we are, the need for fundamental change and a direction to move towards
» Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.
» Do you own Kinect or Move?
» b.b.b.b.but Kinect only has casual games!! Move has real games!!

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 :: General Xbox360 Discussion :: 360 vs PS3-